<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smotocel.com/2006/05/podcasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smotocel.com/2006/05/podcasting/</link>
	<description>A few things off the top of my head</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.smotocel.com/2006/05/podcasting/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 09:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smotocel.com/2006/05/podcasting/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Good point. 
I'd add that podcasts are linear; you don't know what follows, you have to make an effort to remember what was said before. Plain text is 2-dimensional; static, you can search, see and skip much more efficiently. As a species, we started seeying long before we started talking. Learning by seeing is much more natural than by listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.<br />
I&#8217;d add that podcasts are linear; you don&#8217;t know what follows, you have to make an effort to remember what was said before. Plain text is 2-dimensional; static, you can search, see and skip much more efficiently. As a species, we started seeying long before we started talking. Learning by seeing is much more natural than by listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
